GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

ORD_10964/2025

Dainese S.p.A.

Datum
2025-04-07
Kammer
Milan (IT) Local Division
Verfahrensart
Amend Document
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDORD_10964-2025-a741c847e9be
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenORD_10964/2025
EntscheidungsreferenzORD_10964/2025
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 5

MILAN - LOCAL DIVISION ACT_45469/2024 UPC_CFI_472/2024 COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT MILAN LOCAL DIVISION UPC CFI no. 472/2024 Act. no. 45469/2024 App. No, 8545/2025 Order n. 10964/2025 issued on 7 April 2025 Headnotes Rule 263, para. 3, RoP applies both in cases where a) the claimant limits the relief sought (petitum), for example by reducing the relief sought (e.g. injunction or damages); and b) the claimant limits the cause of action (causa petendi), for example after starting the proceedings to protect a plurality of patents, then it renounces one of them. Differently from rule 265 RoP, rule 263 RoP does not provide the regulation of the proceeding costs, because the proceedings continue against the defendant in relation to other claims. This solution doesn’t go a ...