Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 3
1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 17 April 2025 application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) Headnote: - Where there is an uncontested fact as meant in R. 171.2 RoP, this does not imply that the legal consequence for which this fact was submitted automatically follows. It still falls upon the Court to decide whether the facts advanced justify such a legal consequence. Keywords: - suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP); uncontested fact (R. 171.2 RoP) APPELLANT (AND DEFENDANT BEFORE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE) 1. Kodak Holding GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany 2. Kodak GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany 3. Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany (hereinafter: Kodak) all represented by Kilian Seidel, Freshfields, Munich, Germany RESPONDENT (AND CLAIMANT BEFORE THE CO ...