GEIST:UPC Searchengine

ORD_19369/2024

Ocado Innovation Limited v. Autostore Sp. z o.o., Autostore System GmbH, Autostore System AT GmbH, Autostore System AB, Autostore System S.L, Autostore System Srl, Autostore AS, Autostore S.A.S.

Datum
2024-04-10
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Generic Order
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDORD_19369-2024-5f9952ac437b
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenORD_19369/2024
EntscheidungsreferenzORD_19369/2024
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 12

1 DECISION of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 10 April 2024 concerning public access to the register (R.262.1(b) RoP) HEADNOTES: - Art. 9(1) UPCA must be interpreted such that if the subject matter of the appeal proceedings is of a non-technical nature only, and there are no technical issues at stake, the Court of Appeal may decide the matter without the need to assign two technically qualified judges to its panel of three legally qualified judges. This is without prejudice to the fact that once technically qualified judges have been assigned, they will, as judges, have to deal with the entire dispute, including the non-technical aspects thereof. - When a request to make written pleadings and evidence available to a member of the public is made pursuant to R.262.1 ...