GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

ORD_29391/2025

AorticLab srl v. Emboline, Inc.

Datum
2025-06-20
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Appeal RoP220.2
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDORD_29391-2025-f3a13a5a32b1
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenORD_29391/2025
EntscheidungsreferenzORD_29391/2025
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 7

1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 20 June 2025 concerning security for costs (R. 158 RoP) HEADNOTES Art. 69(4) UPCA does not provide a legal basis for granting a security for costs at the request of the claimant in an infringement action. The same applies to a claimant in a revocation action pursuant to Art. 32(1)(d) UPCA). The ratio behind Art. 69(4) UPCA is the protection of a defendant against an insolvent claimant, who initiates an action, without having sufficient means to compensate the defendant for the legal costs incurred by the proceedings he was involved in at the initiative of the claimant. That same rationale does not apply to a counterclaim for revocation, since such an action is still the direct consequence of the infringement action initia ...