Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 10
1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 4 June 2024 concerning the validity of an opt-out HEADNOTE Art. 83(3) UPCA must be interpreted such that a valid opt out application requires that it is lodged by or on behalf of all proprietors of all national parts of a European patent. KEYWORDS Interpretation of Art. 83(3) UPCA; validity of an opt-out APPELLANT / DEFENDANT IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE Neo Wireless GmbH & Co KG, Ratingen, Germany, hereinafter referred to as ‘Neo’ Represented by: Dr. Christoph Walke, Matthias Waters and Dr. Martin Rütten, patent attorneys, Cohausz & Florack Patent- und Rechtsanwälte, Düsseldorf, Germany RESPONDENT / CLAIMANT IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA ...