GEIST:UPC Searchengine

ORD_36778/2024

Progress Maschinen & Automation AG v. AWM Srl, SCHNELL S.p.A

Datum
2024-07-23
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Appeal RoP220.1
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDORD_36778-2024-7e685f7ae320
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenORD_36778/2024
EntscheidungsreferenzORD_36778/2024
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 9

1 Reference numbers: APL_20002/2024 UPC_CoA_177/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 23 July 2024 HEADNOTES 1. An application for the preservation of evidence or inspection of premises within the meaning of Article 60 UPCA and Rules 192 et seq. RoP implies a request to disclose to the applicant the outcome of the measures, including the report written by the person who carried out the measures. This follows from the fact that the legitimate purpose of the measures is the use of the evidence in proceedings on the merits of the case (Rules 196.2 and 199.2 RoP), which includes the use of the evidence to decide whether to initiate proceedings on the merits and to determine whether and to what extent the evidence will be submitted in these proceedings. Disclos ...