Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 4
1 Reference no.: UPC_CoA_570/2024 APL_53968/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 15 October 2024 concerning an application for a discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) HEADNOTES The inadmissibility requirement under R. 361 RoP must be reserved for clear-cut cases and should not result in a full exchange of arguments and evidence, as is clear from the use of the words “manifestly inadmissible”. KEYWORDS Action manifestly bound to fail. APPLICANT AND DEFENDANT IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE Microsoft Corporation, Washington, US (hereinafter “Microsoft”) represented by Prof. Tilmann Müller -Stoy and Nadine Westermeyer, attorneys at law, Bardehle Pagenberg, Partnerschaft mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte RESPONDENT AND CLAIMANT IN THE ...