GEIST:UPC Searchengine

ORD_56773/2024

Aarke AB v. SodaStream Industries Ltd.

Datum
2024-11-29
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Appeal RoP220.2
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDORD_56773-2024-3c3d77c3ee70
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenORD_56773/2024
EntscheidungsreferenzORD_56773/2024
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 5

1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 29 November 2024 security for costs (R.158 RoP) HEADNOTE When deciding on a request for security for costs - failing any guarantees or other special circumstances, it is not relevant whether the claimant belongs to a - financially sound - group of companies. It is only the financial position of the claimant itself that is relevant; - it is not relevant whether a claimant is willing to reimburse the defendant if a cost order would be issued in favour of the defendant; - It is also irrelevant whether a cost order in favour of the defendant is to be expected. The Court should not engage in evaluating the likelihood of the outcome of the case; - it is not required that it is proven that enforcement is impossible. It is suffic ...