GEIST:UPC Searchengine

ORD_56773/2024

Aarke AB v. SodaStream Industries Ltd.

Date
2024-11-29
Division
Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action
Appeal RoP220.2
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDORD_56773-2024-3c3d77c3ee70
Case number
Registry numberORD_56773/2024
Order referenceORD_56773/2024
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 5

1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 29 November 2024 security for costs (R.158 RoP) HEADNOTE When deciding on a request for security for costs - failing any guarantees or other special circumstances, it is not relevant whether the claimant belongs to a - financially sound - group of companies. It is only the financial position of the claimant itself that is relevant; - it is not relevant whether a claimant is willing to reimburse the defendant if a cost order would be issued in favour of the defendant; - It is also irrelevant whether a cost order in favour of the defendant is to be expected. The Court should not engage in evaluating the likelihood of the outcome of the case; - it is not required that it is proven that enforcement is impossible. It is suffic ...