Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 6
Central Division Paris Seat ORDER of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central division (Paris seat) issued on 9 January 2025 concerning the generic procedural application No. App_56176/2024 UPC_CFI_412/2023 HEADNOTES: 1. Rule 356 (2) ‘ RoP’, insofar as it requires an explanation of the default, shall be interpreted to mean that the applicant must demonstrate that they were unable to comply with peremptory time limits or to appear at the oral hearing at which they were summoned (except as provided for in Rule 116 and 117 ‘RoP’) due to reasons beyond their control and therefore that the default is not attributable to their own fault but was caused by unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure. KEYWORDS: decision by default. APPLICANT: ITCiCo Spain S.L. - C/Pau Piferr ...