GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

ORD_69176/2024

Dainese S.p.A. v S.L.Alpinestars S.p.A., Alpinestars Research S.p.A., Motocard Bike S.l.

Date
2025-04-07
Division
Milan (IT) Local Division
Type of action
Infringement Action
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDORD_69176-2024-4d1855819a2d
Case number
Registry numberORD_69176/2024
Order referenceORD_69176/2024
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 5

MILAN - LOCAL DIVISION ACT_45469/2024 UPC_CFI_472/2024 COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT MILAN LOCAL DIVISION UPC CFI no. 472/2024 Act. no. 45469/2024 App. No, 8545/2025 Order n. 10964/2025 issued on 7 April 2025 Headnotes Rule 263, para. 3, RoP applies both in cases where a) the claimant limits the relief sought (petitum), for example by reducing the relief sought (e.g. injunction or damages); and b) the claimant limits the cause of action (causa petendi), for example after starting the proceedings to protect a plurality of patents, then it renounces one of them. Differently from rule 265 RoP, rule 263 RoP does not provide the regulation of the proceeding costs, because the proceedings continue against the defendant in relation to other claims. This solution doesn’t go a ...