GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

UPC-CFI-0001536/2025

Dolby International AB v. CPYou B.V., Acer Italy SRL, Acer Computer GmbH, Acer Computer B.V Benelux, Acer Denmark A S, Acer Finland Oy, Acer Computer France, Acer Sweden AB

Datum
2026-08-18
Kammer
The Hague (NL) Local Division
Verfahrensart
Infringement
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDUPC-CFI-0001536-2025-19c5762de4c3
AktenzeichenUPC-CFI-0001536/2025
RegisterzeichenUPC-CFI-0001536/2025
Entscheidungsreferenz
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 6

1 Local Division The Hague UPC-CFI-0001536/2025 UPC-CFI-0000982/2026 UPC-CFI-0001168/2026 Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 8 July 2026 regarding: panel review of order of 1 May 2026 (R. 333) HEADNOTES: 1. Review of an order to accept a counterclaim for rate-setting against an intervener (Pool administrator) denied. 2. R. 315.4 RoP entails that an intervener is to be treated as a party, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This means as a principle that a counterclaim (for rate-setting) may be directed to such intervening party. The more so since Vectis intervened on the side of claimant, Dolby. According to the principle of “equal treatment” (CoA 27 November 2025, UPC_CoA_70/2025 (Strabag), m.n. 16), a counterclaim directed at the p ...