GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

UPC_CFI_344/2025

Irdeto B.V. v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. and others

Datum
2026-02-27
Kammer
Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Verfahrensart
Infringement Action
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDUPC_CFI_344-2025-709cf6012d32
Aktenzeichen
RegisterzeichenUPC_CFI_344/2025
Entscheidungsreferenz
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 3

1 Local Division Mannheim CFI_344/2025 CFI_735/2025 [PR-UPC-CFI-0000639/2026] Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court issued on 27/02/2026 (concerning the fee for a Counterclaim) Headnote: It follows from Rule 370.7 RoP that if a counterclaim for revocation is submitted on behalf of several defendants, only one court fee needs to be paid for that counterclaim. However, if one of the defendants submits their own counterclaim at a later stage (e.g. because the statement of claim was served much later), that defendant cannot rely on the fee already paid by the other defendants. In this situation, it is not the same action/counterclaim in the meaning of Rule 370.7 RoP, even if the content of the submission is the same. Therefore, a separate fee must be paid. ...