Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 67
Hamburg - Local Division UPC_CFI_494/2025 UPC_CFI_1128/2025 Decision of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 24/08/2026 HEADNOTES: 1. For competition law reasons, the patent holder is only required to indicate to the patent user one licensing route that satisfies the FRAND requirements (concurring with LD Munich, decision of 18 December 2024 – UPC_CFI_9/2023 – Huawei v Netgear, p. 136). 2. However, there are constellations where the implementer can demand a bilateral licence instead of a pool licence. Such constellations are for example, but non- exclusively, given when the implementer expressed its desire to obtain a multi- standard-licence or to sign cross-licencing agreements with the individual patent proprietors. The same applies when an implementer had ...