GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

UPC_CFI_495/2025

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten For-schung e.V., v. HMD Global Oy

Date
2026-08-24
Division
Hamburg (DE) Local Division
Type of action
Infringement
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDUPC_CFI_495-2025-9aa0f688c670
Case number
Registry numberUPC_CFI_495/2025
Order reference
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 69

Hamburg - Local Division UPC_CFI_495/2025 UPC_CFI_1131/2025 Decision of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 24/08/2026 HEADNOTES: 1. For competition law reasons, the patent holder is only required to indicate to the patent user one licensing route that satisfies the FRAND requirements (concurring with LD Munich, decision of 18 December 2024 – UPC_CFI_9/2023 – Huawei v Netgear, p. 136). 2. However, there are constellations where the implementer can demand a bilateral licence instead of a pool licence. Such constellations are for example, but non - exclusively, given when the implementer expressed its desire to obtain a multi - standard-licence or to sign cross -licencing agreements with th e individual patent proprietors. The same applies when an implementer ...