Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 11
Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Local Division Munich issued on 28 October 2025 HEADNOTES Even if no counterclaim for revocation has been filed because the time limit under Rule 23, 25 RoP has not yet expired , costs and expenses of representation associated with a (future) counterclaim for revocation must also be taken into account when determining the amount of security for costs of the infringement proceedings (continuation of Munich LD, Order of 3 July 2025, UPC_CFI_127/2024 and UPC_CFI_149/2024 – Headwater vs. Motorola). KEYWORDS Security for costs; Counterclaim for revocation Lokalkammer München UPC_CFI_729/2025 2 CLAIMANTS 1. BFexaQC AG, represented by its CEO Bernhard Frohwitter, Südliche Münchner Straße 56, 82031 Grünwald, Deutschland, 2 ...