GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

UPC_CFI_730/2025

Nera Innovations Ltd. v. Xiaomi Comunication Co., Ltd a.o.

Date
2026-01-05
Division
Hamburg (DE) Local Division
Type of action
Application For Costs
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDUPC_CFI_730-2025-a82263cdc973
Case number
Registry numberUPC_CFI_730/2025
Order reference
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 10

1 Hamburg - Lokalkammer UPC_CFI_730/2025 Entscheidung des Gerichts erster Instanz des Einheitlichen Patentgerichts, erlassen am: 05/01/2026 HEADNOTES: 1. In principle, a party is always entitled to be represented before the EPO by a legal representative and a patent attorney jointly, i.e. by two authorised representatives, Art. 48(4) UPCA. 2. However, appeal proceedings under Rule 220.2 RoP concerning a specific procedural issue do not require the involvement of more than one authorised representative, R. 151.1 R.P. 3. The upper limit of reimbursable rep resentation costs cannot be used for the assessment of costs in appeal proceedings under R. 220.2 R.P. concerning procedural sub-issues. 4. A party to the dispute must always be allowed to participate in an oral hearing before the UPC with ...