GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

https-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-182789-32985d0d9d99

Dyson Technology Limited v. Dreame International (Hongkong) Limited, Teqphone GmbH, Dreame Technology AB

Datum
2026-03-06
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Appeal RoP220.1
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDhttps-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-182789-32985d0d9d99
Aktenzeichen
Registerzeichen
Entscheidungsreferenz
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 19

1 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court concerning an application for provisional measures issued on 6 March 2026 HEADNOTE 1. While the function of a structural element must be considered when interpreting a claim feature relating to such an element, the interpretation must likewise take into account the physical and spatial configuration of the elements as taught by the patent. 2. The requirement to limit an injunction to the specific infringing acts which the infringer has committed cannot be derived from Art. 62(1) and Art. 25(a) UPCA. As a general rule, the fact that a party has infringed the patent is sufficient to establish a risk of further infringement through other acts of use, including infringing acts which it had not previously committed. KEYWORDS Appeal; pro ...