GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

https-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-182958-d6713127ebec

EOFlow Co., Ltd. v. Insulet Corporation

Datum
2026-02-04
Kammer
Luxembourg (LU)
Verfahrensart
Appeal RoP220.2
Sprache
EN

Metadaten

Fall-IDhttps-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-182958-d6713127ebec
Aktenzeichen
Registerzeichen
Entscheidungsreferenz
Schlagwörter
Leitsätze

Dokumente und Volltext

Textextraktion: pypdf | Seiten: 9

1 ORDER of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 4 February 2026 Concerning an application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) and appeal against an order imposing penalties (Art. 82(4) UPCA, R. 354.4 RoP) and awarding costs HEADNOTES: - Orders imposing a penalty payment (Art. 82(4) UPCA, R. 354.4 RoP) are not orders as specified in Art. 73(2)(a) UPCA or R. 220.1(c) RoP. The last sentence of R. 354.4 RoP reads: "(...) the Court may make an appropriate order which may be subject to an appeal pursuant to Rule 220.2." This means that an appeal against those orders is only admissible if leave to appeal is granted by the C ourt of First Instance who issued the order, or the Court of Appeal gran ted leave to appeal after discretionary review according to R. 220.4 RoP. KEYWORDS ...