GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

https-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-183021-cb8010e9cf50

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited v. Flexicare (Group) Limited

Date
2026-04-10
Division
Milan (IT) Central Division- Section
Type of action
n/a
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDhttps-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-183021-cb8010e9cf50
Case number
Registry number
Order reference
Keywords
Headnotes
_blocked_reasonchallenge_page_detected
_parsing_noticeThe server returned an interstitial/challenge page instead of the expected detail page.

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 34

1 UPC_CFI_480/2025 Decision of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central Division Milan issued on 10 April 2026 concerning EP4185356 HEADNOTE: When assessing novelty, the Court will examine the disclosure of the prior art document overall and will compare this disclosure to the scope of the patent in suit. If one way of “mapping” leads to the assessment that a piece of prior art is novelty destroying, this leads to the result that the patent must be revoked. KEYWORDS: Claim interpretation. Admissibility of auxiliary requests. Lack of clarity. 2 CLAIMANT: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited, 15 Maurice Paykel Place, East Tamaki, Auckland, 2013, New Zealand, Representatives: Thorsten Haslinde, Marc Wachenhausen and Vladimir Traykov, European Patent Attorneys and register ...