GEISTWERT Rechtsanwälte Lawyers Avvocati

https-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-183974-82ef0933d174

Insulet Corporation v. EOFLOW Co., Ltd.

Date
2025-05-01
Division
Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action
Appeal
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDhttps-www.unifiedpatentcourt.org-en-node-183974-82ef0933d174
Case number
Registry number
Order reference
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 32

1 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 30 April 2025 concerning a request for provisional measures HEADNOTES: 1. The interpretation of a patent claim is a matter of law. Therefore, the Court cannot leave the judicial task of interpreting the patent claim to an expert but has to construe the claim independently. 2. The skilled person is a notional entity that cannot be equated w ith any real person in the technical field of the invention. The decisive factor is not the individual knowledge and abilities of a person, but rather the general specialist kn owledge that is customary in the relevant field of technology, as well as the average knowledge, experience, and abilities in this specialist field. It is for the Court, not the expert, to assess these circumstan ...